Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

Is Russia’s S-400 Air Defense System Really So Dangerous Afterall?

Su-25
Su-25. Image Credit: Bulgarian Military.

Given that Russia has failed to achieve air superiority in Ukraine, there have been questions raised about the effectiveness of the much-hyped S-400 “Triumf,” an air defense system that the Kremlin has touted as the best in the world.

(Subscribe to 19FortyFive‘s New YouTube Channel here.) 

 

S-400: Not So Scary? 

Visitors to next week’s 14th Aero India 2023 International Air Show will have a chance to see the system up close, as it will be among the offerings on display from the state-owned JSC Concern VKO “Almaz-Antey.”

The Russian arms maker has announced it will demonstrate the latest models of the latest S-400 “Triumf” long-range and S-350E Vityaz medium-range surface-to-air missile systems.

“The S-400 Triumf is designed to provide highly effective protection against air strikes, strategic, cruise, tactical and theater ballistic missiles under enemy fire and jamming,” the company’s press office told state-media outlet Tass on Thursday.

“The S-350E Vityaz is designed to shield administrative, industrial and military facilities against massive strikes by various types of existing and future air attack weapons.”

The press office added that the S350E was capable of operating autonomously or being integrated into a customer’s air defenses.

India is already a foreign operator of the S-400, and there have been concerns raised that it could drive a wedge between Washington and New Delhi, as India continues to remain a Western partner while still being among the largest customer of Russian military hardware.

Earlier this month, it was announced that the third batch of S-400 air defense systems to India will be completed shortly.

Latest Tor Platforms

In addition to the S-400 and S350E air defense systems, the Russian firm will present its Tor-M2K, Tor-M2E, and Tor-E2 short-range surface-to-air missile systems.

The Tor-M2KM autonomous combat module was based on the chassis of India’s Tata Motors and the Taifun-PVO(E) anti-aircraft fighting vehicle.

The Tor M2KM is a Russian short-range air defense missile system that was developed specifically for export and evolved from the Tor M2E. First unveiled in 2013, the air defense system was offered to India, but initially without any success.

However, the development and testing of the system was completed in 2015, and it now appears that Almaz-Antey is once again attempting to court New Delhi.

Almaz-Antey has announced it will provide information on the Redikom mobile repair and measuring facility, while it will provide performance characteristics of the Adyutant universal target training facility that offers multiple targets simulating major advanced air attack weapons.

The firm is a major Russian integrated defense manufacturer comprising over 60 enterprises with about 140,000 in its workforce. It currently supplies products to over 50 countries of the world.

It is just one of the multiple Russian defense makers that will be presenting at the 14th Aero India 2023 International Air Show, which is scheduled to run in Bangalore from February 13-17.

Held every two years, it has become among the largest air shows in Asia, and Russia remains an active participant.

This year, the Kremlin will present more than 200 military products and platforms at Aero India 2021.

MORE: Ukraine Needs M1 Abrams Tanks Now (But Will Have to Wait)

MORE: Joe Biden Won’t Send F-16 Fighters to Ukraine

MORE: Why Putin Should Fear the F-16 Fighter 

MORE: Why Donald Trump Can’t Win in 2024

Author Experience and Expertise

A Senior Editor for 19FortyFive, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer. He has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,200 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, politics, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes and Clearance Jobs. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

Written By

Expert Biography: A Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,000 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. H.R. Holm

    February 9, 2023 at 9:10 pm

    Well, there is only one way discover whether it lives up to its stated promise: actual battlefield use. Now given the effectiveness of past Russian weaponry such as the T-34 tank, AK-47 battle rifle (I’m not going to use that *stupid* term ‘assault’), the infamous ‘Stalin Organ’ multiple rocket launchers of WWII, the Mig-15 and -21 fighters, the SAM -2/-3 antiair missiles in Vietnam, and the Sagger anti-tank missile and SA-6 antiair missile of the Yom Kippur war—–do we really want to find out?

  2. Cheburator

    February 10, 2023 at 12:36 pm

    about air superiority in Ukraine – have you heard about the successful use of aviation by Ukraine for a long time?
    Zelensky won arranged a tour of the world with an outstretched hand and asks to put planes on Ukraine, but almost all experts agree that Ukraine is not able to use NATO-standard strike aircraft – there are no airfields, infrastructure, and Russia covers the entire territory of Ukraine with an air defense umbrella and rockets.
    The fact that Russia is not ramming Ukraine into the stone age – I think Putin has his own reasons for this, but Russia dominates the air over Ukraine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement