Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

‘Ammo Detonated’: Ukraine Footage Shows Powerful Drone Attack on T-72 Tank

According to the post, Russian forces targeted the Ukrainian MBT with a ZALA Lancet, an unmanned aerial system (UAS) and loitering munition. Developed for the Russian Armed Forces by ZALA Aero, a subsidiary of the Kalashnikov Concern, the Lancet was first unveiled at the Army-2019 Military International Technical Forum, Russia’s largest arms trade show.

Lancet Drone Attack in Ukraine
Lancet Drone Attack in Ukraine

A video shared on social media this week captured the moment that a Lancet loitering munition struck a Ukrainian T-72M1 main battle tank (MBT) in the Zaporizhzhia Oblast.

According to the post from Ukraine Weapons Tracker (@UAWeapons), the vehicle was totally destroyed after its ammo was detonated. 

It is unclear if any of the crew survived the strike.

The video has been seen nearly 250,000 times since it was posted to Twitter on Wednesday.

It has also been shared on the Telegram social media platform – and is one of the Kremlin’s rare “victories” in the region, where Russian forces have taken massive casualties.

Russia’s Lancet in the Spotlight

According to the post, Russian forces targeted the Ukrainian MBT with a ZALA Lancet, an unmanned aerial system (UAS) and loitering munition. Developed for the Russian Armed Forces by ZALA Aero, a subsidiary of the Kalashnikov Concern, the Lancet was first unveiled at the Army-2019 Military International Technical Forum, Russia’s largest arms trade show.

The UAS was first combat tested by Russian forces in Syria in November 2020.

According to Russian state media, the Lancet drone is equipped with several types of guidance systems, including coordinates, optoelectronics, and combined technologies. The UAS is also reported to be highly autonomous while its optical-electronic guidance system can help it independently “ferret out and destroy a target.”

The drone is equipped with a television communication channel that transmits an image of the target, which also allows for confirmation that the target has been hit. The platform is capable of destroying targets within a radius of up to 40 kilometers.

The Lancet’s maximum takeoff weight is 12 kilograms.

Russian forces have been employing the Lancet in the Zaporizhzhia Oblast since last summer.

“Strikes were delivered against the militants of [Ukrainian President Vladimir] Zelensky, using Russian-made Lancet-3 loitering munitions. This is a big step forward and this is a munition drone that flies accurately towards its target. Before that, we were terrorized only from that side. Now our army is responding to this challenge,” Vladimir Rogov, a Russian member of the chief council of the region’s military-civilian administration,  said in a July 2022 broadcast on the Soloviev.Live TV channel, Tass reported.

One Fewer Ukrainian T-72

Both sides have lost significant numbers of MBTs to drones in the now-year-long war in Ukraine. The T-72M1 seen destroyed in the video is an upgraded model of the Soviet-designed Cold War-era tank.

It is equipped with an improved fire control system incorporating a thermal sight that attracts attention by its low silhouette, relatively lightweight, lethal armament, and high reliability at minimum operating costs, which has put it on a par with the best tanks in other countries, immediately and for years to come.

The T-72M1 has been noted for retaining all the virtues of the baseline tank while incorporating new advances that ensure it can maintain an edge over its counterparts.

However, the days of the MBT taking command of a battlefield could be coming to an end thanks to the capabilities of drones.

Author Experience and Expertise: A Senior Editor for 19FortyFive, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer. He has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,200 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, politics, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes and Clearance Jobs. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

Written By

Expert Biography: A Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,000 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Fred Leander

    March 25, 2023 at 2:01 pm

    Imagine – a Russian “success” advertised in a western news outlet – not bad! The author nevertheless must necessarily downtalk it:

    “…It has also been shared on the Telegram social media platform – and is one of the Kremlin’s rare “victories” in the region, where Russian forces have taken massive casualties”.

    Of course, the author knows nothing about of how rare Kremlin’s victories are or whether they have taken “massive casualties” simply because he has nothing else to show to than Ukrainian sources. And, as most of us know, to totally rely on one of the warring parties’ claims as to what they have achieved against the enemy is rather foolish. Military history is full of examples of this.

    As for “rare victories” if the western media cared to look into the Russian media sphere, and post from it, they would find plenty of examples of “rare victories”. Of course, to admit this does not work well with the need to project the war as a Ukrainian success story. That said, the Russians are just as prone as the Ukrainians to blow up their success stories.

    “1945” shall have credit for at all posting this article but need to filter the articles better and demand more professionality from their contributors as it is simply too many tendencious allegations and repeating of unsubstianted information. Their authors’ university education should have taught them the importance, and need, of viable references.

  2. Jacksonian Libertarian

    March 25, 2023 at 7:36 pm

    Heavy, slow, tracked, armored vehicles are obsolete on the Information Age battlefield. Western tanks which so many think so highly of, are not going to be much more survivable than any of the armored vehicles now being destroyed in Ukraine. Even trenches have lost much of their defensive strength with the flying claymore mines like the Switchblade 300 which can sweep them clear of troops. Armor has lost even more of its defensive strength, as dozens of different smart weapons can destroy them with one shot. Faster, lighter, quieter, and stealthier wheeled vehicles, armed with longer ranged precision strike weapons will replace them, until unmanned ground drones in turn replace them.

    Hundreds of vehicle mounted TOW missile launchers are being sent to Ukraine. Logistically the West has deep stockpiles of TOW missiles, and these vehicles require a small fraction of the fuel and maintenance of heavy armor. These will serve as fast light cavalry with a powerful punch. If these modern day Mongol horse archers can get into the enemy’s rear, they will savage them.

  3. Fred Leander

    March 25, 2023 at 8:19 pm

    But, Jack – the “….faster, lighter, quieter, and stealthier wheeled vehicles”, are even more vulnerable to the weapons you decribe than a modern tank. Or do you imply that the Russians do not have similar weapons? Doesn’t this article describe one?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement