Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

F-22 Raptor: Why Didn’t The Air Force Build More?

F-22 production stopped in 2011. However, a few years later, many prominent voices were calling for a restart of the program – but it never happened. 

F-22
U.S. Air Force Maj. Paul 'Loco' Lopez, F-22 Demo Team commander/pilot, performs an aerial demonstration during the MCAS Beaufort air show, April 27, 2019. Maj. Lopez has over 1,500 hours flying both the F-15 and the F-22 and is in his second year as the commander of the F-22 Raptor Demonstration Team. (U.S. Air Force photo by 2nd Lt. Samuel Eckholm)

F-22 production stopped in 2011. However, a few years later, there were many prominent voices calling for a restart of the program – but it never happened. 

A wide range of interwoven variables contributed to the eventual decision several years ago not to restart F-22 production. Senior Air Force leaders cited budget as the primary reason, yet many in Congress and at the Pentagon were calling for a massive restart of the F-22 program to expand the fleet to a more impactful size. 

F-22: An Amazing Fighter Jet 

When the F-22 blasted onto the scene in 2005, it was heralded as a first-of-its-kind breakthrough air supremacy platform.

While there are now roughly 169 F-22s currently, the original plan was to build a much larger fleet of stealthy F-22s Raptors. However, during the height of U.S. military counterinsurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan, F-22 production was cut short abruptly.  

A great-power war possibility and the rising threat of China and Russia seemed to fade into the background beneath the fury of counterterrorism and counterinsurgency, so perhaps planners suffered from too much of a “here-and-now” kind of short-term vision.

In contrast, a longer-term assessment might have recognized the long-term threat China was already beginning to evolve into. 

F-22 on the World Stage

Therefore, had the F-22 production line not been cut short far too soon, then a much more sizeable and daunting fleet would currently hold our adversaries at risk. Looking back on the Iraq and Afghanistan years, many Pentagon leaders and weapons developers regard the decision to stop F-22 production as a massive error. 

Was the discussion about re-starting the line an effort to correct the error? Were budget concerns truly the reason? One thought that seems to make sense is that in retrospect when the decision not to restart the F-22 production line was made, just how far along was the 6th-generation aircraft. 

Conceptual work and early subcomponent prototyping, at the very least, was already underway on the 6th-generation stealth fighter and it may have been showing great promise. As the 6th-generation aircraft is now airborne, it may have been much further along than initially thought. Developmental technologies such as digital engineering have enabled the 6th-generation prototypes to become airborne years ahead of what had initially been planned. 

An important note to consider is perhaps at the time decisions were being made about restarting the F-22 line, there was massive progress and promise with 6th-generation lurking just beneath the radar of public view.

This would make sense, as the Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program is thought of as more of an F-22 replacement than an F-35-like aircraft.

For instance, a new high-speed, stealthy 6th-generation air supremacy fighter could complement continuously upgraded multi-role F-35s. 

Author Expertise 

Kris Osborn is the Military Affairs Editor of 19 FortyFive and President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University. 

Written By

Kris Osborn is the Military Editor of 19 FortyFive and President of Warrior Maven - Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement